<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Ron Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inforipple.com/2012/04/understanding-ron-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inforipple.com/2012/04/understanding-ron-paul/</link>
	<description>exploring the tension between liberty and law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 04:47:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keenwaa</title>
		<link>http://www.inforipple.com/2012/04/understanding-ron-paul/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>Keenwaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 22:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inforipple.com/?p=328#comment-932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article. Agree with most the points. However, I think you give the some Republican primary voters too much of the benefit of the doubt. While it&#039;s undoubtedly true that many of his ideas are over the heads of your average voter, I think many of the legitimately conservative primary voters know about the ideas he&#039;s talking about, but are simply too brainwashed in their foreign policy fallacies to support the one candidate who represents everything else they want in a candidate. Many are openly hostile because they desperately cling to the lies that keep them from admitting how horrible their past leaders have been. They would have to admit they&#039;ve been wrong all this time in defending immoral wars, and this would mean they&#039;d have to recognize that many of their past heroes were actually evil, corrupt liars. Not to mention go against all their favorite pundits (Rush, Hannity, O&#039;Reilly, etc) who are too personally invested in defending the lies to ever admit the truth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. Agree with most the points. However, I think you give the some Republican primary voters too much of the benefit of the doubt. While it&#8217;s undoubtedly true that many of his ideas are over the heads of your average voter, I think many of the legitimately conservative primary voters know about the ideas he&#8217;s talking about, but are simply too brainwashed in their foreign policy fallacies to support the one candidate who represents everything else they want in a candidate. Many are openly hostile because they desperately cling to the lies that keep them from admitting how horrible their past leaders have been. They would have to admit they&#8217;ve been wrong all this time in defending immoral wars, and this would mean they&#8217;d have to recognize that many of their past heroes were actually evil, corrupt liars. Not to mention go against all their favorite pundits (Rush, Hannity, O&#8217;Reilly, etc) who are too personally invested in defending the lies to ever admit the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilmington decks</title>
		<link>http://www.inforipple.com/2012/04/understanding-ron-paul/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>wilmington decks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inforipple.com/?p=328#comment-931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What’s Ron Paul’s favorite form of excercise?An evening Constitutional.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s Ron Paul’s favorite form of excercise?An evening Constitutional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
